Fundraisers on Commission
I'm starting to wonder why organizations don't start demanding that their freelancers work on commission. Some non-profits agree to contracts with freelancers that have a set fee in place. This means that in order for the non-profit to actually raise money, the freelancer will first have to raise their own fee, and then the non-profit gets to keep whatever comes after that.
But what if the contractor doesn't raise enough to cover their own fee?
Case study: At a previous organization, I saw management pay a freelance development team $15,000 for two month's work. However, that "top notch, highly recommended" team brought in $7,000. The result was that the organization then LOST $8,000 on a fundraiser! Not good. Management issues aside, this could have solved by a commission. If the contract stated a 20% commission, and the freelancers weren't all they were cracked up to be and only brought in $7,000, then they would be paid $1,400, with the org taking home $5,600. That's ridiculously low, but it's $5,600 more than they had before. And that's a lot better than LOSING $8,000 on what was supposed to be a fundraiser.
Why don't more organizations demand that freelance fundraisers work on commission? Why trust that even the "top notch, highly recommended" contractors will raise enough to cover their fee?